An interview for LÄRA Stockholm

LÄRA Stockholm, is published by the Education Department of the City of Stockholm, six times a year. It highlights good examples from the city’s schools, presents news and research in the educational field and provides inspirational work. LÄRA has received the award of the compound RIM for the year’s best work reports 2013 Arts best photojournalism in 2010. The magazine has also received the Swedish Publishing Award 2013, 2011 and 2009 for best staff magazine – the public sector.

Here the link to the interview in Swedish!

CSCL 2017 – Workshop on Emergent Practices and Material Conditions in Learning and Teaching

I am proud to announce that our worksop on “Emergent Practices and Material Conditions in Tablet-mediated Collaborative Learning and Teaching” has been accepted at CSCL 2017.

The call for papers is available here

We plant to publish an Special Issue on the workshop after the workshop.

Workshop  website is: https://materialconditionsblog.wordpress.com

Lats time we organized “#TMCL15 – Changing Teaching and Learning Practices in Schools with Tablet-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Nordic, European and International Views” at CSCL 2015.

Workshop organizers are:

Teresa Cerratto-Pargman, Stockholm University, Sweden, tessy@dsv.su.se

Isa Jahnke, University of Missouri-Columbia, USA, jahnkei@missouri.edu

Crina Damsa, University of Oslo, Norway, crina.damsa@ils.uio.no

Miguel Nussbaum, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Chile, mn@ing.puc.cl

Roger Säljö, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, roger.saljo@ped.gu.se

Our Programme Committee 

Jun Oshima, Japan

Yishay Mor, Israel

Marcelo Milrad, Sweden

Chee-Kit-Looi, Singapore

Eva Mårell-Ohlsson, Sweden

Stefan Aufenanger, Germany

Swapna Kumar, USA

Sten Ludvigsen, Norway

Beatrice Ligorio, Italy

Olga Viberg, Sweden

 

 

 

 

Reconfiguring civic participation: open source software in the political space, presented at PDC 2016- Position Paper

This is ongoing work on Democracy OS Argentina I am conducting together with Somya Joshi at DSV. It is a project driven by a passionate group of people who started Democracia en Red (Net Democracy), Partido de la Red The Net Party in Argentina and Democracy Earth foundation.

In August, I presented our work in the TING workshop at the Participatory Design Conference. Read about our first approach of democracy OS. here: PDF.

Organizing provocation, conflict and appropriation: The role of the designer in making publics

Second Call for Papers to a Special Issue of Design Issues:
Organizing provocation, conflict and appropriation: The role of the designer in making publics

Because of the importance of the role and embodiment of the designer/artist in making publics, this special issue draws attention to reflexive practices in Art & Design, and questions how these practices can be embedded in the formations and operations of publics and design practices. More specifically, the special issue aims to explore the following questions: How do the designer/artist create and maintain publics? How do we accommodate differences in these agonistic spaces? What is the role of the designer/artist in these contexts? How can we understand the tension between artistic control in speculative design and empowerment in participatory design?

This issue will contain the best papers received and presented in the corresponding workshop in the Participatory Design Conference in Aarhus in August 2016 (PDC2016) entitled “Ting: Making publics through provocation, conflict and appropriation”, as well as other invited contributions.

We invite researchers, designers, activists, artists, who in their work are exploring utopian, speculative, and critical design projects as well as designing for and with social movements, alternative societies and relational economies, to contribute to the theme of ‘Organizing provocation, conflict and appropriation: The role of the designer in making publics’. Authors are invited to consider (but are not limited to) the following issues and questions for this special issue:
Design as world making and as a way to create a public space
Agonistic public spaces versus consensual decision-making;
The role of the author/designer/creator/artist in speculative and critical design in relation to participatory design;
Politics of Participation
Exclusion and inclusion in the design practice;
Norms in speculative participatory design practices
The tension between artistic control in speculative design and empowerment in participatory design
The tension between empowerment and exploitation, between participation and precarious labor.

GUEST EDITORS
Shaowen Bardzell, Indiana University
Tessy Cerratto Pargman, Stockholm University
Carl DiSalvo, Georgia Institute of Technology
Laura Forlano, Illinois Institute of Technology
Karin Hansson, Stockholm University (Managing Guest Editor, khansson@dsv.su.se <mailto:khansson@dsv.su.se>)
Jaz Hee-jeong Choi, Queensland University of Technology
Somya Joshi, Stockholm University
Silvia Lindtner, School of Information, University of Michigan

TIMELINE
01.9.2016: Submission deadline for intentions to contribute (1500-2000 words)
01.10.2016: Notification of relevance sent to authors / selected contributions invited to continue
01.12.2016: Full papers submission deadline for those selected to continue (5000 + references)
01.02.2017: Notification of accept / reject / revisions to authors
01.06.2017: Final manuscript submission deadline
15.09.2017: Final selected manuscripts to production

BACKGROUND
http://performingthecommon.se/ting/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/DesignIssues.pdf <http://performingthecommon.se/ting/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/DesignIssues.pdf>

For more information, and submissions e-mail: ting@performingthecommon.se <mailto:ting@performingthecommon.se>

Whose Future Is It Anyway? Limits within Policy Modeling

This is a paper written together with Somya Joshi, Daniel Pargman and Andreas Gazis. We are presenting it at LIMITS 2016, at UCI (USA) in June.

Read the whole paper here

Abstract

In the age of Big Open Linked Data (BOLD), we inhabit a landscape where future scenarios are imagined, modeled, planned for and embedded in policy. Between the euphoric techno-utopian rhetoric of the boundless potential of BOLD innovations and the dystopian view of the dangers of such innovations (e.g. ubiquitous surveillance etc.), this paper offers a critical understanding of the boundaries that are traversed by the implementation of BOLD within policy modeling. We examine BOLD as a tool for imagining futures, for reducing uncertainties, for providing legitimacy and for concentrating power. In doing so we further develop the LIMITs community’s conceptualization of the societal limitations on computing, with specific reference to the assumptions, interpretations and trust that we place in these models when making socio-environmental policy decisions. We use an illustrative case of policy modeling, which provides a much-needed critical discussion of the inherent limitations and risks as well as the promises that are offered by BOLD.

Our work on “The Internet at the ecovillage. Performing Sustainability in the Twenty-First Century” is finally published!

This is part of the work I conducted during my sabbatical at UCI. It has been great to work on this paper with Bonnie and Daniel!

The Internet at the eco-village: Performing sustainability in the twenty-first century

Teresa Cerratto-Pargman, Daniel Pargman, Bonnie Nardi

Abstract

Is the digital infrastructure and its footprint an ideological blind spot for recently emerging ecological communities, including eco-villages? This paper examines how a group of people who are concerned with environmental issues such as peak oil and climate change are orchestrating a transition toward a more sustainable and resilient way of living. We studied a Swedish eco-village, considering how computing in this community contributes to defining what alternative ways of living might look like in the twenty-first century. Drawing on a social-ecological perspective, the analysis illustrates, on the one hand, that the Internet, along with the digital devices we use to access it, capitalizes and mobilizes values, knowledge and social relationships that in turn enhance resilience in the eco-village. On the other hand, the analysis shows that an explicit focus on ecological values is not sufficient for a community of individuals to significantly transform Internet use to conform to ecological ideals. This work contributes to a deeper understanding of the imbrication of social technologies with practices that are oriented to perform sustainable and resilient ways of living.

Full text

LIMITS 2016 – June 9-10 Irvine- USA.

I am proudly co-organizing the Second Workshop on Computing within LIMITS 

LIMITS aims to foster discussion on the impact of present or future ecological, material, energetic, and/or societal limits on computing. These topics are seldom discussed in contemporary computing research. The medium-term aim of the workshop is to foster concrete research, potentially of an interdisciplinary nature, that innovates on technologies, techniques, and contexts for computing within fundamental limits. A longer-term goal is to build a community around relevant topics and research. A goal of this community is to impact society through the design and development of computing systems in the abundant present for use in a future of limits and/or scarcity.

Presenting our work at ICT4S- Nominated for the Best Paper Award

Somya Joshi and I had a really great time discussing and writing up this paper that was nominated for the best paper award! We did not win the award but Somya won the best paper presentation award after she did an awesome presentation of our paper : On Fairness & Sustainability: Motivating Change in the Networked Society.

Abstract . Caught between the infinite promise unleashed by technology proliferation and the unprecedented scale of resource depletion, waste and inequity, we inhabit a space where critical alternatives are sought more than ever. As a reflection of the above, we find in HCI, a slant towards technological quick-fixes to existing sustainability problems, as opposed to a more holistic approach that includes behavioural and societal change. It is within this context that this paper is situated, where we propose a socio-ecological approach and argue our case for a life-cycle lens towards building systems that are in line with our current understanding of the earth’s finite resources. We do so by presenting an illustrative case study of what such critical alternatives might look like, by examining the Fairphone movement. We contribute to a deeper understanding of how social value laden enterprises along with open technological design can shape sustainable relationships between our environment and us.